|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The crypto industry went into the midterms with the biggest political war chest it has ever had. It came out with a Democratic Congress, a stalled flagship bill and a failed campaign against one of its loudest critics. So what did the money buy?
Public Citizen put the industry’s spending on the 2026 midterms at $233 million. Cointelegraph’s tally of super PAC spending is lower, at $176 million across 100 seats, but the picture is the same. This was a coordinated, nationwide push, and it was not subtle.
The Marquee Race Went the Wrong Way
The single biggest line item was $64 million aimed at keeping Sherrod Brown out of the Senate. Brown is now returning, and he is likely headed to the Senate Agriculture Committee. Elizabeth Warren, another of the industry’s sharpest critics, is tipped to chair Senate Banking.
Think about that trade. The industry spent heavily to remove a critic and instead faces a more powerful opposition bloc, with a long memory of who funded the campaign against it.
A Friendly Senate Still Couldn’t Pass the Bill
Here is the harder truth. Even with sympathetic majorities, the CLARITY Act’s cloture vote failed 49–50 in September. The bill’s problem was never a lack of votes from the industry’s allies. Disagreements over ethics provisions contributed to the impasse, and those disagreements came from the White House’s own crypto ventures: memecoins and a stablecoin linked to the president’s family.
Hadley Stern, founder of Fidelity Digital, told Cointelegraph Magazine that a sitting president’s family launching memecoins and a stablecoin is a real governance problem. No super PAC check solves that. Industry money can fund campaigns, but it can’t buy back credibility once the industry’s loudest political ally becomes its biggest liability.
The Case That the Money Worked
There is a real counterargument, and it deserves a fair hearing. Stand With Crypto counts 50 of 100 senators as pro-crypto against 33 opposed, and 241 House members in favor against 106 opposed. That is a strong base of support in both chambers, and it didn’t appear by accident. The House passed its version of the CLARITY Act back in July 2025 by 294 to 134, with 78 Democrats in favor.
So spending may have helped build a durable, bipartisan pro-crypto caucus. That has value even when one flagship bill stalls, and it could matter when a rewritten bill comes up. Democrats are reportedly weighing a broader market structure bill, so the next round will happen with these relationships in place.
Also Read: Bitcoin Developer Wants Quantum Thieves to Pay for Their Own Trap
What Comes Next
The lesson isn’t that political spending is pointless. It’s that spending without discipline is expensive theater. The industry bought votes, but it did not buy trust, and trust is what the next bill needs. Kyle Bligen of the Decentralization Research Center expects significantly more scrutiny in the next Congress, and security failures like the $6.3 billion Binance hack give skeptics fresh ammunition.
If crypto wants a different return on its next $200 million, it should spend less on defeating individual critics and more on getting ahead of the ethics and consumer protection questions that stalled this bill. Accepting strong anti-corruption language is cheaper than another failed Senate vote.
The midterms showed what crypto money can do and what it can’t. The industry should read that result carefully before writing the next check.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
I’m the cryptocurrency guy who loves breaking down blockchain complexity into bite-sized nuggets anyone can digest. After spending 5+ years analyzing this space, I’ve got a knack for disentangling crypto conundrums and financial markets.
