Is Tether (USDT) Stable? Alameda’s Dominant Role in Minting Raises Questions

USDT

Coinbase Director Conor Grogan’s recent disclosure has shed light on the substantial involvement of Alameda Research in minting Tether (USDT) tokens. A detailed on-chain data analysis revealed that Alameda was responsible for creating a massive $39.55 billion worth of USDT, accounting for approximately 47% of Tether’s circulating supply as of October 10, 2023. This figure represents a significant increase from a prior estimate of $36.7 billion, showcasing the extent of Alameda’s influence on the stablecoin market.

Alameda’s involvement in minting USDT is not new, but the scale of its operations has come as a surprise to many. The company has maintained a close relationship with Tether for several years, and has played a key role in providing liquidity for the stablecoin. However, the revelation that Alameda is responsible for nearly half of Tether’s circulating supply raises a number of concerns, particularly regarding the stability of the stablecoin.

One of the main concerns is that Alameda’s dominant role in minting USDT gives it a significant degree of control over the stablecoin. This could potentially allow Alameda to manipulate the price of USDT or to mint new tokens without the backing of adequate reserves. Additionally, Alameda’s close ties to Tether could raise questions about the transparency and accountability of the stablecoin.

Another concern is that Alameda’s financial situation has come under scrutiny in recent months. The company has been linked to a number of risky investments, and its recent bankruptcy has raised concerns about its ability to meet its obligations. This could potentially have a negative impact on the stability of USDT, if Alameda is unable to redeem USDT tokens that have been minted.

The recent disclosures about Alameda’s involvement in minting USDT have raised a number of important questions about the stability and transparency of the stablecoin. It is important to note that Tether has denied that Alameda has any special privileges in terms of minting or redeeming USDT tokens. However, the fact that Alameda is responsible for nearly half of Tether’s circulating supply is a significant cause for concern.

Also read: SBF Considered Raising Money from Saudi Crown Prince to Repay FTX Customers, Former CEO Claims

It is important for Tether to be more transparent about its relationship with Alameda and its minting process. The company should also provide more information about its reserves and how it ensures that USDT tokens are always fully backed. Additionally, Tether should take steps to reduce Alameda’s influence on the stablecoin, such as by diversifying its list of minting partners.

Conclusion

The recent developments involving Alameda and Tether are a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in the cryptocurrency industry. It is also important for investors to be aware of the risks associated with investing in stablecoins, particularly those that are not fully backed by reserves.

About The Author