The bankruptcy of cryptocurrency exchange FTX has taken a controversial turn, with creditors expressing outrage over the proposed repayment scheme. The controversy stems from FTX’s decision to base creditor repayments on cryptocurrency prices from November 2022, the time when the exchange initially filed for bankruptcy. This has led to widespread dissatisfaction among creditors, many of whom have suffered significant losses, including life savings.
FTX Creditors To Receive 10-25% Of Holdings
According to reports, FTX creditors will receive between 10% and 25% of their holdings under the proposed repayment plan. What has intensified their frustration is that these repayments will be calculated based on crypto prices from the petition date, when Bitcoin (BTC) was trading at around $16,000. In contrast, Bitcoin now hovers around $65,000, meaning creditors feel shortchanged by the massive price gap.
The repayment calculation has left creditors reeling. “Many of us invested our life savings into FTX,” one creditor lamented. “Now, we’re being asked to settle for a fraction of what our crypto is worth today.” Several creditors have reported experiencing severe emotional distress, including panic attacks and anxiety, as a result of the FTX collapse and the ongoing uncertainty surrounding repayments.
Pushback Against Repayment Structure
Creditors are not the only ones raising concerns. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has pointed to potential legal challenges, particularly if FTX attempts to repay creditors using stablecoins instead of the actual cryptocurrencies they lost. Critics argue that stablecoins, which maintain a relatively fixed value, would further reduce the value of what creditors are set to recover.
Many creditors believe that the reorganization plan, as it currently stands, fails to adequately compensate for their losses. Their dissatisfaction comes on the heels of FTX and Emergent Technologies securing $600 million in Robinhood shares to help repay creditors. FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried co-founded Emergent, and the deal was viewed as a critical step toward making creditors whole.
Agreement With Emergent Technologies
As part of the restructuring process, FTX CEO John Ray III revealed in a Delaware bankruptcy court motion that FTX would pay Emergent $14 million to cover administrative expenses. This followed Emergent’s decision to withdraw a petition to claim 55 million Robinhood shares. The agreement, approved in early September, is intended to streamline the resolution of Emergent’s own bankruptcy case in Antigua and ultimately recover more funds for FTX creditors.
Ray described the negotiations as “good faith arm’s length,” emphasizing that the settlement was designed to maximize value for FTX creditors. He noted that by avoiding additional litigation costs, the exchange could focus on recovering as much money as possible for those who had lost their assets in the collapse.
Despite the settlement, FTX creditors remain skeptical about the reorganization plan, arguing that it offers them little relief compared to the current market value of their crypto. Calls for FTX to revise its repayment terms to reflect current cryptocurrency prices have grown louder, with some threatening legal action if the current plan moves forward.
The controversy surrounding FTX’s repayment plan underscores the ongoing uncertainty plaguing the cryptocurrency industry. As crypto prices surge, the challenge of determining fair compensation for those affected by exchange collapses like FTX becomes even more complex.
Also Read: Caroline Ellison Sentenced To 2 Years In Prison – Key Witness In $11 Billion FTX Fraud Scandal
For now, FTX’s creditors are left waiting—and hoping—for a resolution that better reflects their significant financial losses
This article highlights the ongoing tensions between FTX’s creditors and the exchange’s leadership as they grapple with a repayment plan that many argue fails to account for the dramatic rise in cryptocurrency prices since the bankruptcy filing.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
