Ethereum, the powerhouse behind smart contracts and decentralized applications, is gearing up for its most ambitious upgrade yet: Pectra. But as excitement builds, Ethereum developers are grappling with a pivotal decision that could reshape the upgrade’s rollout. With the complexity of Pectra’s proposed changes, there’s growing consensus to split the upgrade into two distinct phases.
Initially slated to be Ethereum’s largest hard fork to date, Pectra has been anticipated with bated breath by the crypto community. Hard forks, in blockchain parlance, represent significant software upgrades that can alter the blockchain’s protocol. However, as developers delve deeper into Pectra’s intricacies, concerns are emerging about the risks associated with implementing such a sweeping overhaul all at once.
In a recent All Core Developers call, the idea of bifurcating Pectra gained traction. Parithosh Jayanthi, a key Ethereum DevOps Engineer, advocates for this split to mitigate risks and expedite the deployment process. Jayanthi told CoinDesk, “We’re talking about splitting it into two forks mainly to reduce the risk of a bug and to enable faster shipping of both forks.”
The proposed split would see Pectra divided into two separate upgrades. The first phase would incorporate Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) like EIP-7702, designed to enhance wallet functionality. This proposal, famously drafted by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in a mere 22 minutes, aims to streamline user interactions with the blockchain. The second phase would focus on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) upgrades, specifically the Ethereum Improvement Proposal known as EOF.
The decision on whether to proceed with this split will be made during Thursday’s All Core Developers Consensus layer call. If approved, the first part of Pectra could be rolled out as early as February 2025.
Despite the potential benefits, the proposed split is not without its drawbacks. Ansgar Dietrichs, an Ethereum Foundation researcher, points out that deferring certain features like EIP-7594, or PeerDAS, to the second phase might temporarily impact layer-2 blockchains. PeerDAS is crucial for improving data availability, which is vital for scaling Ethereum’s throughput. Dietrichs acknowledges that while there could be a slight increase in fees for layer-2 solutions in the interim, the long-term benefits of a phased approach outweigh the drawbacks.
“PeerDAS is crucial to ensure L2s have more room for future throughput growth,” Dietrichs explained. “So the sooner we ship it, the more certain we can be that we can support whatever throughput L2s might need over the next year.”
In the end, the consensus among Ethereum developers seems to lean towards the split. Alex Stokes, an Ethereum Foundation researcher, summarized the sentiment during the recent call: “Generally, smaller forks are less risky.” This cautious approach reflects a broader understanding that managing complexity and risk is crucial for maintaining Ethereum’s stability and progress.
As Ethereum stands on the brink of this landmark upgrade, the decision to split Pectra could set a precedent for future blockchain development strategies. Whether this approach proves to be a masterstroke or a misstep remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Ethereum’s developers are committed to navigating the challenges of innovation with both caution and ambition.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
