The cryptocurrency industry is making waves in the U.S. Congressional elections, pouring unprecedented amounts of cash into key races, potentially reshaping the legislative landscape in 2025. According to Open Secrets, organizations like Fairshake have raised over $200 million this election cycle, with significant funding from major players such as Ripple and Coinbase. As the nation heads to the polls, the outcomes of pivotal Senate races in states like Ohio and Montana could have far-reaching implications for the future of cryptocurrency regulation.
Alison Mangiero, executive director at the Proof of Stake Alliance, emphasizes that regardless of individual race outcomes, this election will result in the most pro-crypto Congress to date. “We’ve poured so much money into these races that now the real work is going to begin,” Mangiero remarked in an interview with The Block. This influx of funds is not just about winning seats; it’s about creating an environment more conducive to the growth and acceptance of digital assets.
The presidential candidates have also engaged with the crypto conversation in ways that are particularly notable this election cycle. Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic plan underscores support for innovative technologies, including digital assets, while prioritizing consumer protection. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump has promised to halt what he describes as an “unlawful and un-American crackdown” on the crypto sector, showcasing his backing for the World Liberty Financial project.
Prediction markets have further influenced this election season. Following a court ruling that allowed prediction market Kalshi to offer election-related bets, the platform has seen its markets go live. Decentralized prediction platform Polymarket also recorded significant activity, with nearly $3 million wagered on the presidential race as of November 1. Analysts note that while these markets can be imprecise, they serve as a barometer of real-time public sentiment regarding electoral outcomes.
As we approach Election Day, current forecasts suggest Republicans have a strong chance—91%—of seizing control of the Senate, with the House race showing a tighter competition. The outcome of these elections could drastically affect the Senate Banking Committee, which oversees key regulatory bodies like the SEC and CFTC that govern the crypto landscape.
Should Republicans take the Senate, Sen. Tim Scott, a supporter of the crypto industry, could chair the Senate Banking Committee. Scott has already expressed intentions to establish a subcommittee dedicated to digital assets, potentially paving the way for crucial legislation that promotes a reliable regulatory framework for trading and custody of cryptocurrencies. “Senator Scott will work to build a regulatory framework that establishes a reliable pathway for digital assets,” a spokesperson stated.
Conversely, if Democrats maintain control, Sen. Sherrod Brown, who has taken a critical stance on cryptocurrency, will likely continue as chair. However, should Brown lose his seat, there is speculation that Sen. Elizabeth Warren could take the helm—an outcome that would likely stifle pro-crypto legislation given her history of advocating for stringent regulations.
In the House, pivotal leadership changes are on the horizon, with Rep. Patrick McHenry set to retire. His departure opens the door for a new chairperson, which could influence the future of key bills, including those focused on stablecoin regulation and market structure.
Overall, the combination of a cash-flush crypto industry and a burgeoning pro-crypto congressional presence could signal a new era of legislative progress for digital assets. As Mangiero aptly puts it, “Next year will be the most pro-crypto Congress ever,” suggesting that lawmakers will need to engage with and educate themselves about these emerging technologies to govern effectively.
The stakes are high, and as the election unfolds, all eyes will be on how these dynamics play out, shaping the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
