Ripple Fights Back – Cross-Appeal Filed Against SEC’s $125M Ruling Amid $2B Aspirations

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently took a firm stance in the ongoing legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by filing a cross-appeal. This move comes on the heels of the SEC’s appeal against a court ruling that imposed a $125 million civil penalty on Ripple—far less than the staggering $2 billion the SEC initially sought.

In a statement shared on social media platform X, Garlinghouse criticized the SEC’s aggressive tactics and urged the regulator to accept its defeat rather than prolonging what he termed a “disruptive agenda.” He underscored the chaotic regulatory environment under SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s leadership, which he argues stifles innovation in the burgeoning cryptocurrency sector.

Garlinghouse’s assertion is not merely about Ripple’s financial implications; it speaks to a larger vision for the cryptocurrency industry. He articulated that the company aims to conclude its case with a precedent-setting decision that clarifies regulatory boundaries for digital assets. “We are committed to advocating for a transparent and predictable regulatory framework,” Garlinghouse stated, emphasizing that the SEC’s current approach hampers technological growth in the U.S.

Legal Perspectives On Ripple’s Case

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, also weighed in on the significance of the cross-appeal. He highlighted the legal merit of Ripple’s position, claiming that the SEC lost on several crucial points during the initial proceedings. “The SEC’s appeal underscores its failure to substantiate its claims against Ripple,” Alderoty noted, reinforcing Ripple’s confidence as they navigate this complex legal terrain.

Bitnomial vs. SEC – A New Chapter

Ripple’s case is not the only challenge facing the SEC. Cryptocurrency derivatives exchange Bitnomial has also filed a lawsuit against the regulator, contesting its authority over XRP futures contracts. Bitnomial, regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), sought to offer an XRP-U.S. Dollar futures contract but faced intervention from the SEC, which claimed these contracts should be classified as “security futures.”

In its lawsuit, Bitnomial argues that the SEC has overstepped its regulatory bounds, asserting that the CFTC is the appropriate body to govern such futures contracts. This dispute illustrates a growing trend of cryptocurrency firms pushing back against perceived regulatory overreach.

A Rising Tide of Industry Pushback

The legal skirmishes between Ripple, Bitnomial, and the SEC reflect a broader resistance within the cryptocurrency industry against the regulator’s aggressive stance. Earlier this month, Crypto.com also filed a lawsuit against the SEC, arguing that the regulator is wrongly asserting that nearly all cryptocurrencies qualify as securities.

Also Read: Ripple Swell 2024 Kicks Off In Miami – 8th Edition Draws Top Finance Leaders Amid RLUSD Launch Speculation

As more players, including Ripple and Bitnomial, challenge the SEC’s jurisdiction, the outcomes of these legal battles could significantly reshape the regulatory landscape for digital assets in the U.S. The ripple effects—pun intended—of these cases may lead to a more defined framework for how cryptocurrencies are governed, impacting innovation and investment in the sector.

As Ripple navigates this complex legal landscape, Garlinghouse and Alderoty’s commitment to transparency and regulatory clarity may set crucial precedents for the entire cryptocurrency industry. With the SEC facing mounting legal challenges, the industry stands at a pivotal moment where the balance of regulatory power could shift, fostering an environment conducive to innovation rather than stifling it. The coming months will be critical in determining not just Ripple’s future but the broader trajectory of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States.

Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.

About The Author

Bitcoin (BTC) Previous post Breaking The 200-Day MA – Could Bitcoin (BTC) Surge 274.79% Again?
Next post MEXC Exchange Leads in Global Memecoin Listings with Over 240 Pairs
Dark