The Polygon (POL) community has rejected a $1.3 billion stablecoin yield-generation proposal, citing security concerns and a lack of user opt-in mechanisms. The preliminary proposal (pre-PIP), spearheaded by Web3 risk provider Allez Labs in collaboration with DeFi protocols Morpho and Yearn, aimed to deploy funds from the PoS Chain bridge into curated lending pools to generate yield.
Community members raised alarms about the risks associated with the strategy, leading Polygon developers to halt the proposal. A statement from Polygon acknowledged the importance of community feedback, emphasizing the governance process as a valuable tool for exploring innovative ideas.
Aave Proposes Withdrawal Amid Escalating Tensions
In a surprising turn, Aave contributor Marc Zeller proposed phasing out Aave’s lending protocols on the Polygon PoS chain. Zeller cited potential security risks related to bridge funds involved in yield strategies. This move followed his earlier critique of the pre-PIP, where he argued that Aave’s alternative approach—leveraging its Umbrella program and Safety Module—would have mitigated risks.
RE: Stake the Bridge proposal and Aave’s “Operation Polygon(e)”
— Polygon (※,※) (@0xPolygon) December 17, 2024
Recently, a pre-PIP went live from @AllezLabs and @Yearnfi regarding the staking of Polygon PoS bridge funds.
A pre-PIP is exactly what it sounds like: an early proposal to get feedback and gauge sentiment from the…
However, tensions escalated when Polygon developers accused Aave’s leadership of undermining the proposal due to Morpho’s growing traction as a competitor. Polygon pointed to Aave Chan’s earlier enthusiasm for a similar strategy that involved converting stablecoins into Aave’s yield-bearing token, stataUSDC.
Aave Founder Defends Protocol and Leadership
Aave founder Stani Kulechov entered the fray, defending Aave’s governance and infrastructure. He highlighted Aave’s pivotal role in Polygon’s ecosystem, noting that 40% of Polygon’s total value locked resides in Aave protocols. Kulechov criticized Polygon’s narrative, suggesting the team abandoned the proposal and shifted blame onto Aave.
Kulechov also reiterated that Aave’s infrastructure could have supported a custom market tailored to Polygon’s needs, emphasizing that the Safety Module aligns with risk-averse strategies.
Uncertain Future for Aave on Polygon
With the yield-generation proposal shelved, the Aave community faces a critical decision: whether to maintain or withdraw its protocols from the Polygon PoS chain. The fallout underscores the complexities of balancing innovation, security, and collaboration in decentralized ecosystems.
Also Read: Lido Shuts Down Staking Operations on Polygon, Shifts Focus to Ethereum
As the dust settles, the controversy serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing blockchain governance and the need for transparent, community-driven solutions.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
