The ongoing legal tussle between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple has taken a new turn, with the SEC officially filing an appeal against Judge Analisa Torres’s July 2023 ruling, which favored Ripple and clarified that XRP is not classified as a security for programmatic sales. This appeal, now registered with the U.S. Court of Appeals, raises fresh questions and confusion in the cryptocurrency community.
Ripple enthusiasts are abuzz with speculation, particularly after one user on X hinted that a settlement could materialize within the 14-day window following the SEC’s “Notice of Appeal.” The user’s theory posits that the SEC’s appeal could be a strategic move to increase the initial $125 million penalty imposed on Ripple. However, they stressed that XRP’s status as a non-security remains intact, regardless of the appeal’s outcome.
Clarity Amid Confusion
Adding a layer of complexity, former SEC attorney Marc Fagel has stepped into the fray to clarify misconceptions surrounding the appeal. Fagel asserts that the SEC’s appeal does not aim to alter the penalty amount and, in his view, there is little realistic possibility for a settlement. This stance aligns with the SEC’s prior actions, where they pursued an interlocutory appeal concerning programmatic sales, showcasing a consistent strategy in their approach to Ripple.
When prompted about the potential for a settlement, Fagel acknowledged that while theoretically possible, the current ideological divide between the SEC and Ripple, particularly regarding cryptocurrency regulations, makes a settlement highly improbable. He emphasized that the appeal is fundamentally rooted in the SEC’s quest to uphold its regulatory authority over the crypto space.
As the clock ticks on the 14-day period following the SEC’s notice, the possibility of a settlement remains a topic of discussion. Lawyer Bill Morgan pointed out that the SEC has filed only a notice of appeal, indicating that there may still be room for negotiation. If both parties can find common ground during this timeframe, they could potentially nullify the appeal.
However, Morgan, too, expresses skepticism about the likelihood of a settlement due to the significant ideological gap between Ripple and the SEC. He noted that while specific points could be negotiated, the overarching issues surrounding the regulatory landscape would likely hinder any substantial agreement.
Potential Cross-Appeal from Ripple?
Furthermore, Morgan raised the intriguing possibility of Ripple considering a cross-appeal. This could involve challenging various issues, including the injunction and institutional sales. With the SEC focusing primarily on programmatic sales, as highlighted by Fagel, it remains to be seen whether Ripple will pursue this route. Morgan suggests that if Ripple opts for a cross-appeal, it should specifically target institutional sales related to its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) customers, a move that could further complicate the ongoing legal saga.
Also Read: Ripple vs. SEC – Appeal Threatens XRP, Price Drops 15% To $0.52 Amid $125 Million Penalty Dispute
The Road Ahead
As both the SEC and Ripple navigate this complex legal landscape, uncertainty looms large. The next few weeks could prove pivotal for Ripple, especially regarding its standing in the cryptocurrency market and broader regulatory implications. The ongoing dialogue, punctuated by legal maneuvering and speculative commentary, highlights the intricate dynamics at play in the evolving world of cryptocurrency regulation.
The outcome of this appeal, along with the potential for a settlement or cross-appeal, will undoubtedly shape the future trajectory of Ripple and set important precedents in the ongoing regulatory discourse surrounding digital assets. As this saga unfolds, all eyes will be on the courtroom—will clarity emerge, or will the confusion continue to reign in the crypto community?
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
