In a surprising legal move, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken action against ConsenSys, the Ethereum incubator behind the popular wallet MetaMask. Filed on Friday, the lawsuit accuses ConsenSys of running afoul of several laws with its MetaMask wallet, particularly its “swaps” feature and staking services.
The SEC claims that MetaMask’s swaps functionality, which allows users to exchange tokens seamlessly, effectively makes it an unregistered broker-dealer. Additionally, the agency argues that MetaMask’s staking service, which facilitates user interactions with liquid staking protocols like Lido and Rocket Pool, should be classified as an unregistered securities program. According to the SEC, ConsenSys has indirectly underwritten millions in illicit securities transactions through its software.
However, the case against MetaMask has been met with skepticism from industry experts. Nick Almond, CEO of Factory Labs, argues that the SEC’s assertion that an open-source crypto wallet should register as a broker-dealer is fundamentally flawed. Almond contends that MetaMask’s role is akin to a tool that users control directly, rather than an intermediary managing transactions.
“The issue is about custodiality—whether users have sovereign control over their assets,” Almond explained. “If MetaMask doesn’t hold users’ funds, it shouldn’t be classified as a broker-dealer.”
This argument finds support in a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Katherine Failla, who dismissed similar SEC claims against Coinbase Wallet. Judge Failla concluded that Coinbase, as a self-custody wallet, was not acting as a broker because users maintained control over their funds. This precedent suggests that MetaMask might have a solid defense.
Jorge Izquierdo, founder of Tuyo, echoes this sentiment. He points out that providing a user interface (UI) for smart contract interactions is not the same as acting as a broker-dealer. Izquierdo argues that MetaMask’s swapping service is essentially a user-controlled function, rather than an intermediary facilitating transactions.
The SEC’s claims extend to MetaMask’s staking service as well. The agency argues that MetaMask’s role in connecting users to decentralized protocols like Lido and Rocket Pool constitutes an unregistered securities offering. Yet, this argument is challenged by industry voices who view MetaMask’s staking service more as a UI for interacting with decentralized protocols rather than a financial intermediary.
Almond critiques the idea that a frontend service can be considered equivalent to a financial institution. He suggests that regulation aimed at restricting access to decentralized applications might simply hinder user participation without addressing the core functionality of such services.
Moreover, the SEC’s assertions about Lido’s stETH and Rocket Pool’s rETH being securities due to their unregistered status highlight the broader regulatory challenges facing decentralized platforms. As legal experts point out, there is currently no clear mechanism for decentralized applications to register with the SEC, adding to the complexity of the regulatory landscape.
In response to the lawsuit, ConsenSys has pledged to vigorously contest the charges. Bill Hughes, ConsenSys Senior Counsel, expressed confidence in their legal position, emphasizing the broader implications for Web3’s future. “We believe the SEC lacks the authority to regulate software interfaces like MetaMask,” Hughes stated. “We will continue to fight for clarity and fairness in regulation.”
As the case unfolds, it will be pivotal in shaping the regulatory framework for decentralized technologies and could have significant ramifications for the broader crypto ecosystem.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
