The buzz around tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) has gained significant traction, with some experts forecasting monumental growth in the sector. However, not everyone is convinced that these bullish predictions will come to fruition. One such skeptic is Jamie Coutts, Real Vision’s chief crypto analyst, who believes that a more modest target is in order.
In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter) dated August 27, Coutts expressed his reservations about the widespread belief that tokenized RWAs could be worth $30 trillion by 2030. This optimistic figure was originally forecasted by Standard Chartered Bank and Synpulse, projecting a market size of $30.1 trillion by 2034. Coutts, however, argues that this estimate is “overly optimistic” and far exceeds what is realistically achievable within the next decade.
Instead, Coutts offers a more conservative outlook. He estimates that if the current compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 121% continues, tokenized traditional assets might reach a value of around $1.3 trillion by 2030. While this figure is a fraction of the $30 trillion prediction, Coutts emphasizes that even $1.3 trillion in on-chain real-world assets would have a profound impact on the broader crypto ecosystem.
The Tokenization Boom – A Double-Edged Sword?
Tokenization, the process of issuing blockchain-based security tokens representing real-world assets such as real estate, bonds, art, and stocks, is seen as a game-changer in the finance world. The idea is that by bringing these assets on-chain, they become more accessible, transparent, and tradable on a global scale.
However, the road to mass adoption is fraught with challenges. According to a June report by consulting firm McKinsey & Company, tokenized financial assets have had a “cold start” but are on track to reach a market size of about $2 trillion by 2030. The report highlights that for tokenization to succeed, it must offer clear advantages over traditional financial systems. One such promising use case is the tokenization of bonds, which has already seen increased activity with frequent announcements of new tokenized bond issuances.
Implications for Ethereum and Layer-2 Networks
Coutts’ skepticism is not just about the overall market size but also the impact on Ethereum, the leading blockchain platform for tokenized assets. While Ethereum is the preferred platform for early traditional finance (TradFi) asset issuers, the value accrual on the network might not be as straightforward as some expect. Coutts suggests that layer-2 (L2) networks, which are designed to scale Ethereum by processing transactions off the main chain, could capture the lion’s share of revenue—up to 95-99%—leaving only a small percentage to be paid to Ethereum as settlement costs.
This potential dynamic could have significant implications for Ethereum’s role in the future of tokenized assets. “L2s are unlikely to give up their cash cow and allow ETH to scale the L1,” Coutts remarked, indicating that while Ethereum will remain integral, its dominance could be challenged by the rise of L2 solutions.
Also Read: XRP Price Surge Ahead – Leb Crypto Forecasts Breakout To $10 Amid 3.2% Drop And Market Shakeouts
A Cautious Optimism
Despite his conservative estimates, Coutts acknowledges the potential of tokenized RWAs to create a “massive flywheel effect” on other parts of the crypto ecosystem, including non-fungible tokens (NFTs), social platforms, and gaming. If $1.3 trillion were to be tokenized and brought on-chain, it could catalyze significant growth in these areas, driving innovation and adoption across the board.
As the debate over the future of tokenized assets continues, it’s clear that while the potential is vast, the path to realizing it is complex and uncertain. Coutts’ cautionary stance serves as a reminder that while the crypto space thrives on bold predictions, grounded analysis is crucial for navigating the road ahead.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for general purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author’s views are personal and may not reflect the views of Chain Affairs. Before making any investment decisions, you should always conduct your own research. Chain Affairs is not responsible for any financial losses.
About The Author
